But what do you think?
― Edna Welthorpe, Mrs, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
This may seem like a cheap gag (and, in a very real sense, it is), but I *really* did think that.
― Michael Jones, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Douglas, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― mark s, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
And then when I heard about his bizarro writing methods (typing blindfolded and earplugg'd in the dark to keep focused)...forget it. Needing a blindfold and earplugs and a Harlem studio in order to maintain your writerly focus is overkill on the order needing Playtex gloves to wipe your ass. Dude. If you have to go through that kind of ritual in order to write, maybe it just wasn't meant to be, you know?
I like Meet Me in St. Louis!
― Michael Daddino, Friday, 4 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
>>> "This may seem like a cheap gag (and, in a very real sense, it is)"
It's true - that new BT deal is really working for you.
I think that The Sopranos is very average and overrated. I imagine that The Corrections is better (if novel and TV are thus comparable), but could be wrong as I lack Edna's impressive powers of readin' brand new books.
― the pinefox, Saturday, 5 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I don't know. I find that being whiny and self-absorbed has served me well.
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Sunday, 5 January 2003 23:23 (twenty-two years ago) link
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 5 January 2003 23:27 (twenty-two years ago) link
― dave q, Monday, 6 January 2003 09:52 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:29 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 03:08 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Paul Eater (eater), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 04:04 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 18 May 2003 13:31 (twenty-one years ago) link
There were some times when I was conscious of the author's voice coming through the words, and sounding self-satisfied - like "Hey, aren't I brilliant?" but for the most part I was able to lose myself within the story and was not conscious of the writer's ego poking through. I don't think that the writing, itself, was anything miraculous, but I do think it fit well with the story that was being told.
I've two of his other works on my shelves, but haven't yet tackled either - does anyone here have any opinions on Franzen's earlier works?
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Monday, 19 May 2003 00:52 (twenty-one years ago) link
― b.R.A.d. (Brad), Monday, 19 May 2003 02:22 (twenty-one years ago) link
There was a good 300 page book in there. What that man needs is a very good editor, dammit.
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 19 May 2003 02:39 (twenty-one years ago) link
― b.R.A.d. (Brad), Monday, 19 May 2003 02:47 (twenty-one years ago) link
Maybe you're confusing it with something else? I've seen what you describe somewhere but I can't put my finger on it. (Neal Stephenson almost suffers from this, but it's just so entertaining when he does it.)
― Andrew (enneff), Monday, 19 May 2003 09:45 (twenty-one years ago) link
what particularly stuck in my craw was the huge passages of research passing itself of relevant information. what is it with modern authors that they think they have to prove the intelligence by boning up on science and cramming into the the novel ad nauseum, [which also as someone else rightly points out bumps up the page count horrendously]? the authors i can think of who do this with any style wit or to any point are pynchon [surprise] and michel houllecbecq.
i also agree the author did not care for his characters and neither did i, quite frankly.
and the sopranos is the most brilliant TV series i can remember.
― arthur woodlouse (arthur woodlouse), Monday, 19 May 2003 10:23 (twenty-one years ago) link
Again I'll stress that there were large sections of the book that I found very very interesting and well-written, and others that i just found exceedingly tedious.
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 19 May 2003 13:25 (twenty-one years ago) link
it took me over a year to read this and god it was boring. I'm surprised I stuck with it.
― akm, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 17:43 (thirteen years ago) link
should I read freedom now?
― akm, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 17:51 (thirteen years ago) link
no, freedom is much much worse
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 18:22 (thirteen years ago) link
HBO adap of The Corrections coming from Noah Baumbach:
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/chris_cooper_dianne_weist_to_star_in_noah_baumbachs_the_corrections/
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 20 October 2011 14:27 (thirteen years ago) link
w/greta gerwig, ewan mcgregor & maggie gyllenhaal
― john-claude van donne (schlump), Sunday, 15 April 2012 11:15 (twelve years ago) link