would assemblers be able to assemble assemblers ?
would dis-assemblers be able to destroy anything they were programmed to ?
if you could buy assemblers + disassemblers illegally would all trade megacorps be stuffed - would everyone be a designer?
i've just read the 'metal sushi' short stories by david conway - biopunXoR. nanotech is usually dealt with as a neat bit of tech [ medlabz where replacement limbz are grown ] but surely it would be more far-reaching.
please extrapolate wildly !
― , Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
makes Y2K look like a damp squid oh er
― mark s, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― DG, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Alan Trewartha, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Dare, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Gage-o, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
*i should add that the fascination was of the visiting-the-lunatic- asylum type.
For a horrifying second, I thought that said, "grow yr own bum". Which, sadly, is what I'd probably do.
― Dan Perry, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― james, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 7 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
What do they want to accomplish?The vision of CRN is a world in which nanotechnology is widely used for productive and beneficial purposes, and where malicious uses are limited by effective administration of the technology. We believe that even a technology as powerful as molecular manufacturing can be used wisely and well—but that without adequate information, unwise use will be far too common. The mission of CRN is to raise awareness of the issues presented by nanotechnology: the benefits and dangers, and the possibilities for responsible use.
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 30 January 2004 01:37 (twenty-one years ago) link
― S. (Sébastien Chikara), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 01:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― gbx (skowly), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 01:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Friday, 20 January 2006 22:17 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX-gTobCJHs&eurl=http://www.thoughtware.tv/videos/show/1531
"Morph is a concept demonstrating some of the possibilities nanotechnologies might enable in future communication devices. Morph can sense its environment, is energy harvesting and self cleaning . Morph is a flexible two-piece device that can adapt its shape to different use modes. Nanotechnology enables to have adaptive materials yet rigid forms on demand. It is also featured in the MoMA online exhibition "Design and the Elastic Mind". It has been a collaboration project of Nokia Research Center and Cambridge Nanoscience Center."
could also be used as mobile sensor to detect pollutions , gases and other toxic substances present in the environment (also viruses ?)
― Sébastien, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link
awesome I drew a picture of starship when I was 9, maybe I should put that on YouTube.
― Jarlrmai, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 19:54 (sixteen years ago) link
PAZ is a small monarchy in Europe (near Copenhagen, Denmark) named "Freezone" or "The Keep", run by Victor Van Damme. Inhabitants were given free housing, food, and other necessities. In return, they had to swear fealty to Doom. To ensure their loyalty, Doom had each inhabitant given the tattoo of a dragon, which contained nanotechnology in the ink that allowed him to control their minds. Eventually all Freezoners were freed by the Fantastic Four and left.
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link
Paz vs. Pez
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link
what will hit the market first within the next 10-15 years: touch-screen stretch phone or spaceship the bets are onnn
― Sébastien, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.virgingalactic.com/
― Jarlrmai, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link
It will change society in small ways, I'd say.
― Euler, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 20:54 (sixteen years ago) link
the honey dripping on the phone made me think of some properties i heard about nanopaint (which incidently will soon deliver a serious blow to the tin foil hat market): "Engineers have produced a prototype nanopaint that can block RF (radio frequency) fields in much the same way as a metal, such as copper, can do. When applied to the interior walls of a building, the material can selectively pass or impede signals to and from cell phones, portable radios or other wireless devices."
― Sébastien, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link
I have a cat named Pez. He's very dignified.
― Gorge, Thursday, 3 July 2008 01:01 (sixteen years ago) link
There's already quite enough of that going around. First, nanotechnology has to build something other than a blob of atoms that spell "IBM" at a cost of $60 million or so. Then we can talk.
― Aimless, Thursday, 3 July 2008 03:01 (sixteen years ago) link
The most worrying thing about this technology is that all the assorted furries and body-mod oddballs will finally be able to turn themselves into a dog-man with three arses or a mermaid with a raccoon ears or whatever they're currently playing Second Life as.
― Bodrick III, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link
I'm completely ignorant of nanotechnology, so someone tell me - is there anything in commercial production yet?
― Ste, Friday, 4 July 2008 08:40 (sixteen years ago) link
passive nanotech abounds, anything else not so much.
― Jarlrmai, Friday, 4 July 2008 13:31 (sixteen years ago) link
and passive nanotech is really just a branch of materials science.
is this still a thing?
― mark s, Saturday, 29 June 2019 18:15 (five years ago) link
passive nanotech is really just a branch of materials science
^otm. Nanotech, as in as 'controlling the nano-structure of materials', is definitely a thing, although it's still not scalable to mass production in most cases. the silicon wafers used to create computer chips is the best example of an application where it is economically viable.
all the wild fantasies about nano-robots designed to be injected into your bloodstream to repair your internal organs were never any more than wild fantasies to excite the public about The Future.
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 29 June 2019 18:25 (five years ago) link
Sunscreen is another example of nanotechnology that had been commercially developed for some time. (As I understand it, which isn’t much, nanotechnology is any technology that is carried out at the nano-scale, and this can be in any sector - eg from materials to life sciences.
― Luna Schlosser, Saturday, 29 June 2019 18:52 (five years ago) link
‘Is this still a thing’ is something I sometimes wonder about other emerging technologies that have gone very quiet - like graphene.
― Luna Schlosser, Saturday, 29 June 2019 18:53 (five years ago) link
meanwhile the only good tiny robots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH-ycguHLBU
― mark s, Saturday, 29 June 2019 18:56 (five years ago) link
https://dydza6t6xitx6.cloudfront.net/ci-radiant-pig-save-the-robots-east-coast-ipa-e3fff96edbd8f4c1.png
― Vini C. Riley (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 29 June 2019 19:01 (five years ago) link
I am only interested in nanotechnology enabled by domesticated fungi
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 29 June 2019 19:15 (five years ago) link
Move to Oregon in that case is what I hear.
― Luna Schlosser, Saturday, 29 June 2019 19:22 (five years ago) link
Tombot: https://hostdefense.com/pages/who-we-are
― Ambient Police (sleeve), Saturday, 29 June 2019 21:12 (five years ago) link
My people
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Saturday, 29 June 2019 22:27 (five years ago) link
There’s so much cool mycelium tech. In the future, people will be looking for a house to buy, and they’ll say “does it have mold in the walls?” and the answer had better be YES
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 29 June 2019 23:07 (five years ago) link
Last I heard, the Olympic peninsula in Washington state was the nearest thing to nirvana for mycologists.
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 30 June 2019 02:28 (five years ago) link
What's the nearest band to Nirvana for crunchy psych-punks, Milk Music?
― del griffith, Sunday, 30 June 2019 20:16 (five years ago) link