Are all non-classic Rolling Stones records underrated?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (48 of them)
I started with 80's music & wasn't a stones fan until recently. Now I loooove them. Actually not the albums so much as the great songs on them. I've heard maybe 10 or 12 of their albums & not a one doesn't seem to have a lot of filler. So I listen to my 90 min. mix tape over and over instead. Anyways, Of the albums I've heard, this may surprise some, but Undercover is my favorite! Especially "Undercover" "Too Much Blood" and "She was hot." What really gets me into those songs isn't that they're as lyrically & compositionally brilliant as some of the earlier classics- maybe they are, don't ask me about that- it's just the production and the snarly energy it seems to add. See I love 80's synthetic/electronic production & those songs have all the hard dubby-type sound. That, and the slasher film type lyrics are some of the trashiest of anything they've done. Love it. The glammier the better. So I also have to mention that Emotional Rescue is my favorite individual song of theirs next to Gimme Shelter. I also second the dislike for Tattoo You and Some girls- a couple great songs, boring albums.

sucka (sucka), Thursday, 21 August 2003 03:17 (twenty years ago) link

ok, thanks Will. You've made me want to reconsider my opinion on the second side of Tattoo. I just honestly never feel inspired to play it, but I'll give it another close listen.

steve - "Faraway Eyes" was one of the songs I was thinking of in disparaging Some Girls! Really, though I was just being "provocative". Something about the thread just bummed me out, because no one had really mentioned the 90s stuff and everyone had just accepted the thread's premise that Some Girls and Tattoo You were just obviously classic. Who decided that? Anthony DeCurtis or something? What happened to examining received rock-crit norms? Those two records house their biggest post-Exile hits, sure! But do they really hold up as albums you want to throw on and enjoy all the way through? Anyway, I tried to throw out a couple thoughts to add to thread, only to be followed up with a dismissive "they aren't worth discussing." I apologize for snapping at Roger, but I honestly wonder if he's examining his own opinions at times.

Of course I don't think Some Girls "sucks", but it is true that I never play it. I suppose that could be partially due to overexposure, sure. Still, "Miss You" and "Shattered" were fresh and inspired and still sound great to me. "Beast of Burden" I've never liked though. Ever. I just don't like Mick's vocal or the lyrics, and christ it seems like it goes on forever. "Just My Imagination" is an ok performance but it's yet another Motown cover so that's lazy. Even taken as a rocker, "Some Girls" just plods and needless to say sounds embarassing today. When the Stones did "Dear Doctor" and "Country Honk" they sounded lively and novel; "Dead Flowers" and "Torn and Frayed" were poignant and affecting; but "Far Away Eyes" just sounds pointless and parodic.

I don't know. It's still a great record - "When the Whip Comes Down" KILLS - I just never feel like listening to it.

Props to sucka! You and I seem on the same wavelenght w/r/t these guys. Though I usually avoid Undercover for most of the reasons you like it. But that's cool man - you know why you like it! Good on ya. I often just find the record suffocating, but I occasionally find it enjoyable to bathe in all that bile, to get into the vicious headspace of that record... And yeah, "Emotional Rescue" is one of my all time favorite songs of theirs as well.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 21 August 2003 06:07 (twenty years ago) link

dude 'faraway eyes' is better than 'country honk'! 'country honk' is i'd go so far as to say FUCKIN TOTALLY WACK.

duane (24 hour troubleshooter), Thursday, 21 August 2003 06:26 (twenty years ago) link

i think "country honk" is more fun than "honky tonk women," but i'm just weird like that.

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 21 August 2003 06:29 (twenty years ago) link

Duane, it's like Dave Mason said, there's you and me and we just disagree.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 21 August 2003 06:39 (twenty years ago) link

(but I will listen to side two of Tattoo You with you in mind, you big softie)

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 21 August 2003 06:41 (twenty years ago) link

Diamond - no apology necessary, i'm aware that i usually weigh in with a "i like this" or "i don't like that' without qualifying. Truth is, I spend most of my day reviewing records, and i'm usually pretty drained during these 'ilm breaks.' That said, I enjoy a good rapport when one opens up, but everyone here has already said a lot of what I would have.


Plus, The Stones are not the kinda band I get white-knuckled about either way, and if the imminent carpal tunnel syndrome can be held off a bit by me not replying frivolously to every debate, so be it.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 21 August 2003 09:14 (twenty years ago) link

twenty years pass...

Part of the reason I like Black and Blue so much is it sounds as clear as glass. For something taped almost 50 years ago it's extra impressive - I feel it should be some sort of yardstick for analogue recording idk.

you can see me from westbury white horse, Tuesday, 23 April 2024 16:43 (one month ago) link

I agree. Kudos to that mix. Charlie and those guitarists sound great!

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 April 2024 16:46 (one month ago) link

It also really helps in why I think Cherry Oh Baby works, in its admittedly obtuse way. Charlie has clear problems relaxing for a reggae beat but if that's the case you might as well heighten this contrast until (hopefully) the effect becomes something else. Every beat of the drum, slide of the cymbal, sounds so sharp-edged that it suits the stiffness well, and pronounces the sudden silences and rhythmic dropouts even further. Mechanical reggae years before On-U Sound !

you can see me from westbury white horse, Tuesday, 23 April 2024 16:47 (one month ago) link

God, "Hand of Fate" is a sexy-ass song.

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 April 2024 16:51 (one month ago) link

haha that G Marcus quote upthread is amazing

I painted my teeth (sleeve), Tuesday, 23 April 2024 16:51 (one month ago) link

Part of the reason I like Black and Blue so much is it sounds as clear as glass. For something taped almost 50 years ago it's extra impressive - I feel it should be some sort of yardstick for analogue recording idk.

as someone born the year this record came out, this post briefly hurt me to my core to be reminded of the number of years that has passed.

Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 23 April 2024 16:56 (one month ago) link

I recently realised I unconsciously take about ten years off everything whose distance in time feels wrong. Because 38 years makes more sense than 48.

you can see me from westbury white horse, Tuesday, 23 April 2024 17:01 (one month ago) link

Pretty sure “Black and Blue” is my most listened to Stones album at this point. It’s kind of the perfect barbecue in backyard background music. “Hand of Fate” is upper echelon material.

Western® with Bacon Flavor, Tuesday, 23 April 2024 17:58 (one month ago) link

Just spun it thinking of it as chill BBQ/Khruangbin/Mdou Moctor grooves, and yeah! I'd forgotten that it's annoying that there's no track list on the jacket or sleeve, only on the label. But that underscore that they're not crafting songs so much as vibes.

sox concrète (bendy), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 19:33 (one month ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.